Being two (in some cases, former) educators, a lot of our baby name conversations involve shooting down each other’s suggestions due to previous associations. “We can’t do ___ because I had one of those in class and s/he was always____”. Even if we had a positive association with the name, often times it was just one student so it felt weird to use a baby name while having a visual image of only one other person who has the same name.
Having a child in preschool also lends an interesting dynamic to these conversations because we can see the names that seem to be trending upward and those names we also try to avoid. No matter how unique a name is now, if it hits the top 50 in 5 years, no one will notice that you “used it first”. (silly, but important to me)
So we’ve found the magic formula for naming our babies is to choose perhaps a more common name with a unique nickname. The nickname needs to sound “on trend” without actually hitting the trend. Make sense?
Clue #7 : Unlike our other girls’ names, we have previous associations with all 3 names (first, middle, nickname).
This is a new one for us and it is initially why we didn’t entertain this name in the beginning. Ultimately we kept coming back to it and the associations are spread out enough (and more than one/varied) so we could justify it.
Bonus hint: two of the names have been featured on tv shows and it makes me a little nervous that it will sky rocket their popularity. On the other hand, it could just make them a little bit more familiar to people who aren’t name enthusiasts, while they fly under the popularity radar for a few more years. Fingers crossed for the latter!